Wednesday, August 20, 2008

ZooKeys, DOIs, Open Access, and RSS, but why?


ZooKeys (ISSN 1313-2970) is a new journal for the rapid publication of taxonomic names, rather like Zootaxa. On first glance it has some nice features, such as being Open Access (using the Creative Commons Attribution license), DOIs, and RSS feeds -- although these don't validate, partly due to an error at the bottom of the feeds:
<b>Warning</b>:  Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started 
at /home/pensofto/public_html/zookeys/cache/t_compile/%%C2^C2D^C2D18A7A%%rss.tpl.php:5)
in <b>34</b><br />
So, something to fix there.

The RSS feeds are reasonably informative, although they don't include the DOI, which somewhat defeats the point of having them. DOIs need to be first class citizens in taxonomic literature.

But these are technical matters, the real question is why? Why create a new journal when Zootaxa is pumping out new taxaonomic papers at an astonishing rate. Why not combine forces (DOIs and RSS for Zootaxa, yay!)? There is an editorial doi:10.3897/zookeys.1.11 that is rather coy about this. Yes, Open Access is a Good Thing™, but Zootaxa has some Open Access articles. Why dilute the effort to transform zoological taxonomy by creating a new journal?

4 comments:

Kevin Zelnio said...

I too was confused. It seems counterproductive to introduce a new journal with such similarity in name even to Zootaxa. Zootaxa, as you said, has really taken off and it is very exciting to see that. I look forward to publishing in there. As well, the cost for OA in Zootaxa for a typical species description is not backbreaking at $20/page. The charge for ZooKeys seems comparable. Adding another journal just confuses things even more, especially at time when taxonomists suffer from visibility. Zootaxa, I felt, was really starting to unite taxonomy in a way. Being a central resource. I wrote to editor late last year about establishing RSS feeds at least at a phyla level. Never got a response, just like anything I sent to the Zoobank listserve.

I also think the name is confusing. If I didn't hear it was a taxonomy journal, I would have thought it was a clearinghouse for taxonomic keys.

Donat Agosti said...

Rod

there are two (I guess among many) reasons why Zookey has been created.

Zootaxa is running a shoe string budget. According toe Zhi-Qiang Zhang, the editor of Zootaxa, the market for Zootaxa is saturated, that means, that they can not generate more revenues. The current huge output is stretching this budget to the limits, and thus does not allow to expand much beyond what they do right now.

Zootaxa is catering to the taxonomists, and taxonomists do want to have a printed copy on the desk and a free pdf they can disseminate. Most (ca 80% if I am right) taxonomists do not care about open access. Does Zootaxa does not, nor can without external funding make a foray into more open access or even XML output.

Zookey is essentially thought as a direct import into systems like EOL. This is being done by producing an output, next to pdf and print, that is XML/RDF based such as SPM, that is currently being explored as format for hanlding taxonomic data.

Zookey wants to be open access, and is looking into upfront creation of XML documents. Such documents can e much richer semantically enhance - the retrospective mark up, even at very coarse level is extremely tedious and will never be able to compete with prospective mark up.

In this respect, Zookey is already a next generation journal in comparison to Zootaxa.

There are about 1300 journals that produce taxonomic output, among them Zootaxa that has a rather large share. Most of this journal are at best pdf-based, and most of them not yet. So, having one more that can be seen as showing a prespective to disseminate publicatons does not do any harm. Especially, if it as succesful as Zootaxa and draws contribution from journals that are difficult to get (to say the least).

Rod Page said...

Donat,

None of these arguments strike me as compelling. If open access is a response to market saturation, that option is open to ZooTaxa as well. XML markup would be great, but ZooKeys doesn't have that yet, and in principle there's no reason why Zootaxa couldn't go down that route. This just seems to me to be an ill thought out "fork". Perhaps if Zoobank moves beyond the toy stage it might have an impact, but at present it seems a case of "not invented here".

sexy said...

情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,A片,視訊聊天室,聊天室,視訊,視訊聊天室,080苗栗人聊天室,上班族聊天室,成人聊天室,中部人聊天室,一夜情聊天室,情色聊天室,視訊交友網

免費A片,AV女優,美女視訊,情色交友,免費AV,色情網站,辣妹視訊,美女交友,色情影片,成人影片,成人網站,A片,H漫,18成人,成人圖片,成人漫畫,情色網,日本A片,免費A片下載,性愛

A片,色情,成人,做愛,情色文學,A片下載,色情遊戲,色情影片,色情聊天室,情色電影,免費視訊,免費視訊聊天,免費視訊聊天室,一葉情貼圖片區,情色,情色視訊,免費成人影片,視訊交友,視訊聊天,視訊聊天室,言情小說,愛情小說,AIO,AV片,A漫,avdvd,聊天室,自拍,情色論壇,視訊美女,AV成人網,色情A片,SEX,成人論壇

情趣用品,A片,免費A片,AV女優,美女視訊,情色交友,色情網站,免費AV,辣妹視訊,美女交友,色情影片,成人網站,H漫,18成人,成人圖片,成人漫畫,成人影片,情色網


情趣用品,A片,免費A片,日本A片,A片下載,線上A片,成人電影,嘟嘟成人網,成人,成人貼圖,成人交友,成人圖片,18成人,成人小說,成人圖片區,微風成人區,成人文章,成人影城,情色,情色貼圖,色情聊天室,情色視訊,情色文學,色情小說,情色小說,臺灣情色網,色情,情色電影,色情遊戲,嘟嘟情人色網,麗的色遊戲,情色論壇,色情網站,一葉情貼圖片區,做愛,性愛,美女視訊,辣妹視訊,視訊聊天室,視訊交友網,免費視訊聊天,美女交友,做愛影片

av,情趣用品,a片,成人電影,微風成人,嘟嘟成人網,成人,成人貼圖,成人交友,成人圖片,18成人,成人小說,成人圖片區,成人文章,成人影城,愛情公寓,情色,情色貼圖,色情聊天室,情色視訊,情色文學,色情小說,情色小說,色情,寄情築園小遊戲,情色電影,aio,av女優,AV,免費A片,日本a片,美女視訊,辣妹視訊,聊天室,美女交友,成人光碟

情趣用品.A片,情色,情色貼圖,色情聊天室,情色視訊,情色文學,色情小說,情色小說,色情,寄情築園小遊戲,情色電影,色情遊戲,色情網站,聊天室,ut聊天室,豆豆聊天室,美女視訊,辣妹視訊,視訊聊天室,視訊交友網,免費視訊聊天,免費A片,日本a片,a片下載,線上a片,av女優,av,成人電影,成人,成人貼圖,成人交友,成人圖片,18成人,成人小說,成人圖片區,成人文章,成人影城,成人網站,自拍,尋夢園聊天室